Showing posts with label reaction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reaction. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 30, 2016

This is why the reactions thing is so stupid: they’re...



This is why the reactions thing is so stupid: they’re clearly not enough to cover the full range of reactions. Slack’s emoji response system is far better.



via Tumblr http://bit.ly/22PEcKe

Saturday, March 26, 2016

materialsscienceandengineering: Scientists achieve perfect...



materialsscienceandengineering:

Scientists achieve perfect efficiency for water-splitting half-reaction

Splitting water is a two-step process, and in a new study, researchers have performed one of these steps (reduction) with 100% efficiency. The results shatter the previous record of 60% for hydrogen production with visible light, and emphasize that future research should focus on the other step (oxidation) in order to realize practical overall water splitting. The main application of splitting water into its components of oxygen and hydrogen is that the hydrogen can then be used to deliver energy to fuel cells for powering vehicles and electronic devices.

The researchers, Philip Kalisman, Yifat Nakibli, and Lilac Amirav at the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology in Haifa, Israel, have published a paper on the perfect efficiency for the water reduction half-reaction in a recent issue of Nano Letters.

“I strongly believe that the search for clean and renewable energy sources is crucial,” Amirav told Phys.org. “With the looming energy crisis on one hand, and environmental aspects, mainly global warming, on the other, I think this is our duty to try and amend the problem for the next generation.

Read more.

Perfect efficiency? Crazy.



via Tumblr http://bit.ly/1RCBqMW

Monday, January 4, 2016

Ebola Quarantines in U.S. Violated Civil Rights, Weren't Medically Justified, Report Finds

Thursday, November 12, 2015

techcrunch: With Reactions, Facebook supercharges the Like...



techcrunch:

With Reactions, Facebook supercharges the Like button with 6 empathetic emoji

Facebook is taking the wraps off what form the new Like may take. It is rolling out “Reactions,” a new set of six emoji that will sit alongside the original thumbs-up to let users quickly respond with love, laughter, happiness, shock, sadness and anger.

Read more about the new Facebook Reactions. 

This is a good idea. Slack has something similar and it’s excellent.



via Tumblr http://bit.ly/1iXpQll

Tuesday, April 28, 2015

Apple Patent Hints at the Future of iPad as a Creation Device


As reported by TechCrunch today:
"Apple has a new patent, granted today by the USPTO, that details how wireless devices like iPhones and iPads might become context-specific remote input gadgets for use with creative desktop apps like Final Cut Pro, Logic, or even Photoshop. Using the tech described, your iPad could become a touch-screen video scrubber for editing movies, for example, and then easily switch to a color correction panel or audio mixer the next minute depending on your needs."
This sounds like one of the most appealing use-cases for iPad yet. It seems to me as though Apple saw what Rahul Dewan was doing with Duet Display and thought they could do even better.
Apple details how this might be used as well, which sounds like a much better user experience than has been seen in the past:
"In the patent, Apple describes how a user would be able to use their desktop software to set the type of remote that would appear on their device, and then describes how the app on your Mac would then receive commands based on what you do on the remote iPhone, iPad or other wireless device. Some examples include changing the interface for using a connected mobile device as a controller for real instrument audio recording, and then switching it to a MIDI-style virtual instrument input device."
This sounds like a great use-case for the many creators (and normal people who enjoy occasional dabbling like myself) that use Macs. There are many great MIDI-board applications already available for iPad, so it seems like an easy extension to have them control more “serious” Mac composition software. As Darrell from TechCrunch puts it “it’s definitely something that could add value to the ownership of iOS devices for the creative professional audience that already embraces Mac hardware.
Apple’s sales numbers for iPad are down again, and many in the tech community are quick to shout about its inevitable downfall (something something Steve Jobs is dead so Apple is dead nonsense). TechCrunch reports that Apple filed for this patent in 2010, so I would argue they were quite aware of the need to shift focus with iPad.
"The patent was first filed in April of 2010, so it’s been on the shelf for quite a while now, but it’s still an interesting use case to consider, especially as Apple likely continues to re-evaluate the place of the iPad in its overall lineup, and possibly prepares for the launch of a larger, more powerful iPad Pro later this year, should rumors prove correct."
I agree with Darrell that this patent starts to get interesting now, but I disagree that it’s necessarily because of the “iPad Pro” (which I think is a mistake, if real, but that’s a story for another day).
Instead, I think this patent is interesting in light of the new Force Touch sensors that Apple has created. Rumors are that Force Touch will be coming to the next generation of iPhone, and I don’t think it’s a hard stretch to say the feature will come to the next generation iPad either. Force Touch on iPad will mean pressure sensitivity on iPad, which would instantly make it one of the best drawing tablets on the market. It only makes sense, then, that Apple would want to make it easy for users to be able to use that drawing feature in applications such as photoshop. Digital drawing is something that always made sense on the iPad form-factor, but was always less than stellar in practice. This patent and Force Touch promise to change that. If that won’t boost sales, I don’t know what will.
Back on the topic of MIDI boards, as described in the patent, Force Touch could also improve that functionality, making users actually want to use an iPad instead of a physical board. Force Touch would allow pressure sensitivity on the buttons, which could provide nuanced control of the MIDI board. Nuance is always welcome in music making. Another possibility is that Force Touch could be used to pull up a different set of MIDI controls, much the same way that it brings up a layer of secondary controls on Apple Watch.
If this patent is realized, users would finally have a truly compelling reason to upgrade their iPads (beyond the usual “thinner and lighter” reason). That’s likely what Apple needs to stop seeing bleeding iPad numbers.
The point is, the next iPad is the time for change in the product line, and Apple is thinking about what those changes should be. iPad as a creator’s tool certainly sounds intriguing.

Monday, March 9, 2015

Apple "Spring Forward" Event Reactions

My immediate reactions to the news of the Apple event that happened today, 3/9 happened over on Twitter, because that's where I was getting the news from (I had class during the event). I compiled them here for your perusing, including links to the tweets. Be sure to check out my full Twitter feed for all of my retweets as well.












Let me know what you thought of the event in the comments. Also, let me know if you like this kind of post, or if I should go back to longform writing.

Also, I will leave you with this:

Monday, March 2, 2015

Samsung Galaxy S6 Reactions

I just published this story on Medium. Please check it out. There are all sorts of photos and cool formatting things on the original post, which is why I've just chosen to embed it, rather than copy the content over.

Samsung Galaxy S6 Reactions

Let me know what you think in the comments, and please leave a recommendation on the Medium post if you liked it.

Sunday, November 23, 2014

Innovation, Iteration, Adoption, and the Nexus 6

"Nexus 6 is too big for right now, but right sized for the future"

Image Source: http://i-cdn.phonearena.com/images/articles/
146377-image/Google-Nexus-6-unboxing.jpg
That's what Darrell Etherington at TechCrunch said of the 6" screen phone from Google and Motorola. It's a decent article (and it's short), so I definitely recommend you check out his insight. I linked it above for your convenience.

As for me, I think that this same basic idea is the problem that Android has always had to deal with.

One of the beauties of Android is that there are multiple OEM's that use it as an operating system on their devices, so we see many iterations of devices every year. Manufacturers compete with their own previous models and also with each other in order to produce the best devices (or the ones that sell the best). This leads to a much more rapid rate of improvement over companies that control the hardware and the software of their devices (Blackberry, Apple). I attribute the rapid rate of improvement in Android since Gingerbread to this rapid iteration of devices.

The problem, though, is that this rapid iteration doesn't always end up like manufacturers intend. For example, NFC has been essentially standard in Android phones for years, but only now are we starting to see the potential of a real mainstream roll-out or adoption of the technology. Qi wireless charging has been available on many Android phones for years, and it still isn't really being adopted on the mass market. I fear the same thing will happen with the recent quad-HD screen trend as well; we won't have mainstream quad-HD content for years, if we get it at all.

It's great to be on the bleeding edge of technology. As a geek, I love this kind of stuff. But you have to also be able to see that adaptation and change take time.

This is what Apple has been good at since the launch of the iPod. Apple doesn't invent that much new technology (although they like to make it seem like they do, if you watch their keynotes). What Apple does is adopt technologies at the right time so as to make an impact. Their slow iteration approach has worked better for them to this point (I feel that they are suffering from this, now, but that is a post for another day).

This is what ties us back into the article that I started with at the top of the page; the Nexus 6 is too big for today. Yes, there is a "but," but it remains to be seen how important that will be. The question comes down to how soon will society change so that the Nexus 6 is perfect?

The OG Samsung Galaxy Note was ahead of its time. Samsung's strategy of throwing everything at the market and seeing what sticks payed off with that device, and as a result, they essentially own the "phablet" market. The thing is, though, that until last year (and more so this year than last) did the large Note size phone really hit the mainstream. It was too ahead of its time, and most people weren't ready for it.

Meanwhile, Apple didn't make the jump to the larger screen phone until now. And while they didn't make the best optimizations for their device, you cannot say that they are too early to the large device market. A 5.5" phone is no longer the weird monster phone that the OG Note was in 2011.

In case you're not an Apple fan, I also think that Android Wear was an execution by Google that was actually timed appropriately. I think Google waited long enough for companies like Pebble to drum up support and awareness for smartwatches, and then launched a product that just works better (with Android).

So, yes, I think the Nexus 6 captures the current track of technology. I can definitely imagine a future where we return to having a smartphone and a laptop. I can especially imagine this as the current movement towards ecosystems continues (smart homes, Android TV w/ chromecast, Continuity + Handoff, etc). Or perhaps the future is one where tablets still exist, but they're more of a one per family media consumption device, or only used for specialized artistic (or otherwise) tasks.

Again, the question is: is that future coming soon, or is that future a year or more off?

Because I can say that right now, the Nexus 6 is just too darn big.

Wednesday, May 28, 2014

Thoughts on "It's Time to Kill the Surface"

So first, this is the initial post that I'm we're talking about here: http://stratechery.com/2014/time-kill-surface/
Give the full article a read. It will help you understand what is being said above.
Source: http://thewindowsclub.thewindowsclubco.netdna-cdn.com/
wp-content/uploads/2013/10/surface-RT3-400x263.png?0479ea


So, MG Siegler makes the comments on Tumblr:
"Ben Thompson makes the case as to why new Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella should kill off the Surface product line:"
'This here is the greatest danger of forgetting your original goal; you start making up new ones, that are basically “because we need it to exist.” The hardware capability that Nadella claims Surface leverages only exists because of the decision to make Surface. Nadella is basically saying Microsoft needs to make Surface because Microsoft makes Surface. With that sort of reasoning, you can continue on a wrong path forever, just like the Xbox.'
"I was thinking this very thing last night after hearing Nadella speak at the Code Conference. He often seems to be making the case for many of Microsoft’s products because they already exist, not because they shouldexist. As he did with the Surface Mini, I expect him to trim."
This is a really interesting point, and one that goes for Samsung and their 12” tablets: the companies are making projects to answer problems that the large mass of consumers don’t have. Consumers are okay with carrying a laptop and a small tablet around because each serves a different purpose. And nobody that was working on large professional projects on the go thought, gee, I’d like to use a less precise input method while doing this. And consumers certainly didn’t ask for the headaches of Windows RT.
At the end of the day, the solution to consumers not buying your product isn’t to reiterate it. If they weren’t buying the idea before, they’re not sold on the idea regardless of the implementation. It wasn’t a question of poor marketing, it was a question of poor intention. After the first Surface generation, Microsoft should have rethought the whole division entirely. Perhaps the case of having a device to showcase the software for developers and OEM’s (similar to Nexus devices and/or the Chromebook Pixel) makes sense. That’s fine, and then you can charge any price for it because it’s not for consumers.
As it stands, though, even the Surface Pro 3, arguably the best Surface to date. isn’t compelling enough for me to buy, and I imagine most of the rest of the market will feel the same.